Roulette Re: 2017 plans and comparing forums

SpinCat

Trusted Member
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Today at 01:35:36 AM
Steve often says new idea. Outside the box. That haven't been tried before. Caleb says that to

Little constructive criticism for Steve is to read the method

He will admit he hasn't read it and then call it a typical against rbrbrb system (in his words)

There are different ideas. Like ktf. But Steve writes it off without even reading and says try something new lol​

Steve has taken a strong position when it comes to the math of this game.

So if you don't present evidence that you can actually change the odds (which means no mechanical bet selection based purely on patterns), then he's out........no matter how many simulations you want to run.

Exploiting the physics of the game, however, will get his attention, as those can change the odds under certain conditions.

But most members aren't agreeing to the same terms that Steve uses to judge a method because they're creating short-term wins with the goal of piling them up to create long-term profit.

Bottom line:.........if you have a method, test it publicly, and then play it..........and if you win......then come back and gloat.
thumbsup.gif


Continue reading...
 
Top